Insurance company poised to drop Canyon County’s coverage | Live Well

NAMPA, Idaho (AP) — An coverage firm that handles counties and other public entities in Idaho says it will not renew Canyon County’s insurance policy policy due to the fact of escalating challenges and a superior quantity of claims.

The Idaho Counties Danger Administration Software, recognised as ICRMP, despatched a letter to Canyon County officers on May 23, citing “numerous components including adverse declare advancement and growing threat exposures,” the Idaho Push noted. The Nampa-dependent newspaper obtained the doc via public information requests.

Canyon County Community Facts Officer Joe Decker reported the county’s elected officers couldn’t quickly comment since the situation is onging.

“We are doing work to examine all options, together with probable renewal with ICRMP and the prospective acquisition of substitution protection,” Decker wrote in an electronic mail. “More information will be forthcoming when accessible.”

Canyon County Commissioners responded to ICRMP in a June 2 letter that proposed the county may appeal the non-renewal discover. They took problem with the non-renewal final decision, declaring, “the abruptness and comprehensiveness of this complete separation, and the deficiency of warning or option to overcome any perceived issue, is surprising.”

The commissioners also reported the coverage company’s documentation displaying the county’s “loss history” was not correct. They explained 25 of the statements listed are “unrelated to the county.”

They also said the insurance plan organization was equating so-known as “nuisance settlements” — typically created when an entity decides that having to pay anyone to end a lawsuit would be much less expensive or more easy than combating the matter in court — with genuine misconduct by the county or its representatives.

Tim Osborne, executive director of ICRMP, explained in a phone job interview that he could not elaborate on the reasons that the board voted to non-renew the policy. He claimed his workplace is doing work to coordinate a assembly with Canyon County officers to review the “documentation” of the causes the board voted to non-renew. Following that meeting, Canyon County officers could request a conference with the board in open up session about how to transfer forward, he mentioned.