Medicare and Medicaid Facilities Required to Vaccinate Workforce

On Nov. 4, 2021, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) introduced a new Interim Final Rule (IFR) pertaining to workers vaccination at amenities that participate in the Medicare and Medicaid applications. The IFR requires protected companies to make certain that staff acquire their very first dose no later on than Dec. 5, 2021 and reach entire vaccination no afterwards than Jan. 4, 2022.

The vaccine rule that was also produced on Nov. 4, 2021 by the Occupational Security and Health and fitness Administration (OSHA) does not apply to personnel of wellbeing care entities who are covered under the CMS IFR. On the other hand, workers of wellness treatment vendors who are not subject matter to the CMS IFR could be topic to the OSHA vaccine rule if the facility has far more than 100 employees. For more facts on the OSHA vaccine rule, be sure to click below.

Justification for the Rule

CMS cited a selection of reasons for the IFR, such as the chance unvaccinated employees pose to patients, experiences of people today foregoing health care due to worries of contracting COVID-19 from wellness facility employees, disrupted overall health treatment operations due to contaminated employees, and low vaccination rates among the wellbeing treatment employees.

Scope of Protection

The necessities of the IFR implement to health treatment amenities that participate in Medicare and Medicaid and that are matter to Circumstances or Prerequisites of Participation, which include but not limited to:

  • Ambulatory surgical facilities

  • Hospices

  • Hospitals, these as acute treatment hospitals, psychiatric hospitals, clinic swing beds, long-term care hospitals, and children’s hospitals

  • Long-time period treatment services

  • Dwelling well being organizations

  • Thorough outpatient rehabilitation services

  • Crucial obtain hospitals

  • Household infusion therapy suppliers and

  • Rural wellbeing clinics/federally skilled wellbeing facilities.

While the IFR does not directly use to medical doctor offices, which are not controlled by CMS Circumstances or Necessities of Participation, doctors may perhaps yet be needed to vaccinate as a final result of their interactions with other wellness treatment entities. For illustration, the IFR demands hospitals to put into practice policies and processes to make certain “individuals who supply treatment, remedy, or other services less than contract or by other arrangement” are completely vaccinated.

Included Personnel

The IFR requires vaccinations for staff who routinely conduct treatment for individuals and clients inside and outside of the facility, these kinds of as dwelling overall health, home infusion treatment, hospice, and treatment workers. CMS’s vaccination requirement also extends to all employees who interact with other team, people, residents, or shoppers, at any site, and not just these who enter facilities. However, team who supply expert services 100% remotely—that is, personnel who never come into call with other personnel, patients, citizens, or clients—are not subject to the IFR vaccination prerequisites. Moreover, suppliers and suppliers are not required to be certain IFR vaccination compliance of 1-off suppliers, volunteers, or pros, these kinds of as (a) all those who give rare advert hoc non-wellbeing care solutions (e.g. annual elevator inspectors), (b) those people who accomplish exclusively off-site companies (e.g. accounting solutions), or (c) shipping and delivery and maintenance staff.

Definition of Total Vaccination

CMS considers “full vaccination” as 14 days right after receipt of either a single-dose vaccine (these types of as the Johnson & Johnson vaccine) or 14 days just after the next dose of a two-dose primary vaccination collection (such as the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines). At this time, CMS is not demanding the extra (third) dose of mRNA vaccine for moderately/severely immunosuppressed people or the “booster dose” in get for employees to be considered “fully vaccinated.” In addition, CMS considers men and women getting heterologous vaccines—doses of distinctive vaccines—as satisfying the “fully vaccinated” definition so extensive as they have been given any combination of two doses. In buy to gauge compliance, CMS is requiring that providers and suppliers observe and securely document the vaccination standing of each workers member as well as vaccine exemption requests and consequence. The IFR does not specify that weekly testing, masking, and social distancing are an alternative to vaccination, meaning businesses will have to be certain all personnel are either (1) totally vaccinated or (2) exempted underneath a permissible exemption.


The IFR explicitly supplies that companies will have to continue on to comply with anti-discrimination guidelines and civil legal rights protections which enable workers to ask for and receive exemption from vaccination because of to a incapacity, healthcare situation, or sincerely held religious belief or apply. Exemptions ought to be presented to staff members with identified clinical situations for which a vaccine is contraindicated as a fair lodging below the People in america with Disabilities Act. For exemptions for a sincerely held spiritual belief or observe, CMS encourages wellness care entities to refer to the Equal Work Chance Commission’s Compliance Manual on Spiritual Discrimination. Despite the capability to present an exemption, CMS states that exemptions may possibly be offered to personnel only to the extent required by legislation, and that requests for exemption ought to not be offered to all those who seek entirely to evade vaccination. CMS also notes at length that the Food stuff and Drug Administration considers accepted vaccines secure. Appropriately, CMS will likely be unwilling to excuse company and provider noncompliance due to personnel refusing vaccination primarily based on fears about basic safety.


Although the IFR does not establish specific penalties for non-compliance, CMS is expected to use enforcement resources these types of as civil funds penalties, denial of payment for new admissions, or termination of the Medicare/Medicaid service provider arrangement. CMS will utilize Condition Survey Companies to review compliance with the IFR by conventional recertification surveys and complaint surveys. Noncompliance with the IFR will be resolved by founded classification channels of “Immediate Jeopardy,” “Condition,” or “Standard” deficiencies.


While CMS recognizes that some states and localities have founded guidelines to prevent obligatory compliance with vaccine mandates, CMS finally considers the Supremacy Clause of the United States Structure as preempting inconsistent state and nearby laws as applied to Medicare- and Medicaid-qualified vendors and suppliers.

© 2021 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All legal rights reserved.
Countrywide Law Assessment, Volume XI, Range 309